Project

General

Profile

Bug #446

F3200 record number

Added by Jeffrey Painter about 8 years ago. Updated about 8 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
QC_data_checker
Start date:
09/16/2011
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

In QC.cpp, QC::flushData(), reportReplicatedRecord() is called in two places. When the suspected replication involves “previous records”, the first record number is “global”, i.e. it is the sum of the record number in the current file and the number of records in any other files which describe earlier times. When the suspected replication involves “records to be flushed”, the first record number is “local”, i.e. it refers only to the currently open file.

It can be confusing to use two kinds of record number in the same context. I recommend using only the local record number, because, so far as I can tell, the replication check is local to a single file.

History

#1 Updated by Heinz-Dieter Hollweg about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved

please, take note of the bug-fix #2011-0930 in the bug-report.txt file of the QC repository

Also available in: Atom PDF